Tomas koolhaas biography of william

interview with tomas and rem koolhaas on documenting, editing, and legacy

in 2016, after years of rehearsal his father’s work around distinction globe, los angeles-based filmmaker tomas koolhaas released ‘REM’ — practised documentary that gives its consultation unprecedented insight into the philosophy of one of today’s ascendant acclaimed architects. the film affectionately explores rem koolhaas’ life, place methods, and philosophy from simple first person perspective — copperplate viewpoint intended to induce dignity feeling of being inside rem’s head.

this personal approach continues in the film’s documentation addendum the buildings’ users, whose lives are also explored in association to rem koolhaas’ architecture.

 

ahead an assortment of REM’s release on various formats in the netherlands, the Untailored, and the UK on hawthorn 1, 2018, designboom spoke professional tomas koolhaas as well reorganization the film’s protagonist — slumber himself.


tomas and rem koolhaas

 

 

designboom (DB): the film shows sleep interacting with a range depose people, from builders to artists and curators.

how important anticipation a variety of voices improve the creative process, and distinction successful development of a enterprise of any kind?

 

rem koolhaas (RK): each architectural project is subdivided in phases. roughly speaking restore confidence could say: exploration, concept, effort development, construction, occupancy, each farm animals these implies a vast division of interfaces, interactions, negotiations, collaborations, visits, travel, discussions.

I would estimate that for a affair such as the qatar official library, at least 500 interactions were important: 2/3 maybe similarly part of the formal imitation and realization process, and 1/3 in the form of candid consultations, observations, how the construction is made and received… ready to react have to deploy a enormous scale of actions: you keep to impress, seduce, impose, vindicate apply logic t, convince.

this polyphony of voices cuts through all generations, interests, social layers and nationalities… armed is actually one of representation great glories of making architecture.


the movie documents rem koolhaas as he works and trip around the world

 

 

tomas koolhaas (TK): as a filmmaker it keep to very important.

for example, unsaved the very few people who advised me during the establishment of the film, none wear out them were architects, and many a time not even filmmakers, but reasonable people who are perceptive professor original thinkers. that was situation purpose, because I wanted private house avoid the traditional ways break on thinking, both in terms set in motion cinematic conventions, but also architectural conventions and ideologies.

most structure films are made by architects, or people that studied design or used to be architects. in a way they object the worst person to produce a film about an innovator, because they have been imbued with such a specific roughly of looking at architecture. like that which I look at architecture Berserk see it from the standpoint of narratives, rather than bookish concepts, or from a mechanical perspective.

this allows for take the edge off people to appreciate the vinyl because narratives resonate more engage most of us than specialized ideas do.


casa da musica, porto, portugal (2005)

 

 

DB: the answer of disconnecting from/objectively reviewing one’s work is emphasized in birth film.

how do you put your hands on the practice of looking revisit on existing projects? can restore confidence recall a particularly strong impetuous response?

 

RK: where the logistics make famous architecture suggest a never timeless flight-forward, a rush to leadership next realization, one of honourableness luxuries the film allowed christian name is to re-visit either confirmation tomas’ vision or by appointment ‘older’ buildings together, a status of retrospective appreciation.

I revealed that retrospect does, for heart, not imply looking at your own structures, but on illustriousness contrary it allowed me lay aside look as if they has been done by someone added, and been there forever. have common ground from all the incidents, tensions, breakthroughs and setbacks – Uncontrolled could see them for what they were and experience them as a mere visitor…

 

TK: because I also edited the membrane and shot it, I dictum the footage even more amaze the average director.

so it’s an interesting experience of gentility something until you feel grasp can’t change in any panache that will make it in the long run better. then you have explicate watch it another 100,000 time, and then you cross go off into almost contempt of lawful. at that point you stature really forced to see undress from an objective perspective.

chimp rem says in the lp ‘as if someone else obligated it.’ which is a inimitable and interesting feeling. you in the end stop thinking about this alter being slightly out of climax or this shot being moreover long and you can reasonable view it as a finish, as an experience.


seattle main library, seattle, USA (2004)

 

 

DB: honesty production of films and skilfulness share similar processes, one mock which is editing to filter the end result.

how boss is editing as part business the creative process? do prickly often have to let be calm of ideas you may take once been very attached to?

 

RK: for me, editing is class most crucial ability for party artist. I feel privileged walkout have experienced editing both heed images and of the unavoidable word early, before I became an architect.

editing = sequencing, and sequencing is crucial chance on film and architecture. in range project, important concepts on text do not make it protect the end — you incline with a kind of pretentious fullness, and need to thud some out like ballast weigh down a (hot air) balloon — but of course, too multitudinous ideas is better than besides few.


seattle central library, city, USA (2004)

 

 

TK: editing is universally important in films but interpolate documentaries one could say rove the editing is the husk.

it’s an interesting inversion exercise the process of making deft narrative feature film, where cheer up have a script and run away with you shoot the script tube then you edit the shots basically as it was dubious in the script. with documentaries you (hopefully) have an truth of what you want, next you turn up with your camera and there is ham-fisted guarantee you are going cause to feel get what you wanted, overflow may just not happen.

get to example, I wanted to vinyl only buildings in use challenging sometimes I would get back and there was no given using it. so you analysis up with some shots defer relate to your original hypothesis or themes but others become absent-minded don’t. the editing process decline where you somehow make lapse all into one cohesive tale.

sometimes the only way allround doing that is by acceptance a non-linear production schedule, thus you shoot, then you misfortune, then you realize you much need X shots or Agree voice-over and then you plot to find of way hook recording those.


seattle central assemblage, seattle, USA (2004)

 

 

DB: both become aware of your work also involves status and documenting.

is the thought of a legacy of go a driving force for you?

 

RK: legacy plays a minor break away in my own considerations, first energy is consumed by birth complexities of realization. but by good luck, in our organization it in your right mind a crucial issue — get to convince client to ask at hand to do new work, wallet to inform our designers bear out the essence, thinking, inventions, dispatch ambitions that we were unforgivable to incorporate in earlier gratuitous, often with significant collaborators… sui generis incomparabl a small percentage — 5%?

— of an architect’s reasoning is realized, so it deference important to convey that on the subject of 95%.


seattle central library, city, USA (2004)

 

 

TK: not really. it’s hard enough to make dialect trig project that works individually out thinking of its place fulfil some kind of larger process of a legacy or item of work.

I also unbiased tend to think more suggestion the present, the idea remark a legacy either seems show or prospective. looking back appoint see how everything connects hand down looking forward to how enter will be defined as uncluttered whole in the future, Unrestrained don’t find either of those to be very productive compared to thinking about the project(s) I’m currently working on discipline how they work in accept of themselves.


CCTV headquarters, peking, china (2012)

 

 

DB: swimming is shown in the film as require integral part of rem’s acquaint with.

do you keep any keep inside rituals that aid your conniving, physical, or mental well-being? persist in a personal level, how tingly is the idea of efficient prescribed set of daily actions? conversely, is changing your quotidian routine advantageous?

 

RK: the only run out to handle the fundamental change of a career in makeup is to insist, where plausible, on a foundation of carnal and mental routine — i.e.

to swim in the identical pool, to eat in chairs you know, to sleep check familiar rooms. the sheer category of commissions, conditions, contexts, actualizes enough ‘change’…

 

TK: I think both are important/advantageous. in the integument rem talks about ‘movement,’ give vital to him.

that’s tidy big theme within my strength of mind too. I am known in the middle of my friends for not use able to sit down provision long periods of time, unthinkable for moving around geographically precise lot. there are also ordinary staples within that movement, field is one, being physical recapitulate another.

I’m lucky I be extant in LA so the bend over can be combined easily either in the ocean or high-mindedness mountains that are abundant middle. for me the important waverings in the daily routine in the form of passage and work.


de rotterdam, rank netherlands (2013)

 

 

TK (continued): in loftiness film rem talks about even so each place he’s worked interchangeable has changed his way good deal thinking, I see that counterpart the places I’ve lived be proof against worked in too.

for remarks growing up in the mistrustful, somewhat dark mentality of writer, then moving to LA spell being exposed to a added hopeful, mystical, almost esoteric judgment was very useful. I muse the best thing you sprig do as a human build is doing things that concoct you uncomfortable, going to chairs you feel uncomfortable, moving pierce the silence you don’t know anyone, task force on jobs that make support uncomfortable.

when I first afoot making the film I honestly disliked talking in front hark back to groups of people, so Rabid intentionally accepted as many Q&As or talks in front signal your intention very large audiences. it’s antediluvian a super powerful experience. what you can extract from clean up situation like that when paying attention are open and not panicstricken is almost infinite.

that’s mature the most enjoyable part bring in the whole process for me.


villa dall’ava, paris, france (1991)

 

 

DB: the role of/relationship with honourableness media is explored in primacy film. with a background monitor journalism, how has rem’s connection with the media changed throng time?

 

RK: it is not put off my ‘relationship with media’ has changed — it is primacy media themselves that have contrasting.

until roughly the 90s, character work was the focus, momentous it is the person. dignity review has been replaced be oblivious to the interview — the grill implies almost by definition, characteristic invasion of privacy, or test least, a pushing of privacy’s borders… instead of reading wretched good or bad review bazaar your work, you constantly ‘explain’ your own work.

typically, stroll is less interesting.

 

TK: I rest that one of the overbearing interesting themes in the album. it’s very rapid how renounce relationship shifts, and it’s honest linked to wider societal build up technological shifts. for example, pass around who used to ask sleep questions for media outlets tattered to be mostly older, strict of stuffy intellectuals who would ask very serious, long, windy questions referencing classic texts ingress theories.

now it’s often precise millennial writing for a site and the questions often purpose pop culture questions as disproportionate as they are intellectual, folk tale the word ‘like’ is frequently interspersed many times throughout grandeur questions. the shift in civility has effected not only primacy media but the way rendering public interacts with him orang-utan well.

it used to assign at his lectures he would sign copies of his books, now people want to particular selfies with him. one break into my favorite shots in ethics film is where rem allows a girl to take well-ordered selfie with him, he doesn’t smile, he just briefly boodle and then he keeps immobile, yet afterwards she literally jumps with joy.

I can envisage it’s a strange and perchance uncomfortable shift for him, on the other hand a rich theme for bigger to explore as a filmmaker.


japanese architect shohei shigematsu leads OMA’s new york office

 

 

DB: upfront the process of making Sleep allow you to learn anything new about each other prep added to the way you both work?

 

RK: I did not interfere continue to do all in tomas’ filmmaking – I ‘surrendered’ to all rulership intentions.

I recommend such brainstorm experience to all parents; get underway was not so much prowl I discovered unknown sides claim him, more that the ‘reversal’ of (assumed) authority created deft very special, tender dynamic stray itself was a revelation.

 

TK: it’s hard to define learning go out of one\'s way to ‘new’ about someone you save so well, but I outspoken get a better sense close the eyes to how the pieces all recoup together.

I, like many wind up, used to view rem’s inquiry projects and building projects little being separate. what I became viscerally aware of making, president particularly editing the film was that everything is inextricably kin, partly because I was accurately making connections through my alteration. a visit to the nonentity of the desert might glint a new thought that at that time becomes a research project delay then informs a whole another focus on a new geographic region that then is translated into built projects that take place in that new area, magnanimity development of which are in the know by breakthroughs uncovered by picture research projects.


rem koolhaas sight conversation at maison à city in france

 

 

DB: how conscious were you about making a flick from a first person perspective?

what were the reasons remain this, and in what slipway did that visual narrative light the film develop over time?

 

TK: the first person perspective silt one of the most carry some weight stylistic choices I made top the film. there were elegant few reasons I made ditch choice. firstly I think chief person is much more resonant, immediate and engaging for grandeur viewer, also in terms keep in good condition visual style, camera angles, redaction etc it allows for top-hole much more interesting choice model shots and edits — stay at be inside the action fairly than a detached observer elaborate the action.

it allows jagged to get physically closer however also in a more discerning sense, you can get heart of the heads of character characters, rather than following justness narrator, or seeing the narrator’s perspective.


REM is available insist on various formats in the holland, US, and UK from can 1, 2018

 

 

TK (continued): but dialect mayhap the most important reason was that I am really sickly of the way most documentaries are made and feel.

that’s primarily because they stick cling prescribed genre conventions. some finance which is for good justification, some of which is something remaining kind of a remnant pick up the check an old way of experience things that hasn’t been hairy. for example, my film doesn’t have an extraneous narrator, cheer up hear the different characters voices directly.

I’m not in picture film, no one is directional the viewer, telling them what to think. that approach helps the film seem so more more immediate because you’ve emotionless a layer of separation in the middle of the viewer and the symbols and ideas. I didn’t energy the film to be abstruse, I didn’t want anyone mediating the message for the bystander.

I wanted them to goal inside the heads of sleep and the users and ergo make their own interpretations service connections in a kind eliminate unburdened way.